Socrates Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Socrates - Essay ExampleSocrates uses himself as an example when he teaches that dishful does not guarantee happiness. True beauty is cozy beauty, the beauty of singles spirit and character. In conjunction with happiness, which was also a construct that Socrates discussed, he denotes that one cannot tell if a person is happy or not based on his external appearance, scarcely happiness, like kindness, is a matter of inner qualities. His famous motto An unexamined life is not worth living is a testimony to how much he values view and philosophy and the perennial introspection of why we exist. Constantly reflecting about ones life and impact on separates creates pith for a person and Socrates encourages that we indulge in deep, critical idea ourselves at all times. Socrates legacy is not volumes of his philosophical writings, but how he impacted the thinking of other philosophers. Plato described him as an unambivalent individual who stood clearly for some values and firm again st others. For him, there were no time-honored areas2. As a sophist, or wizened people who taught valuable skills for a price, Socrates went against their practice and did not foreign mission for his instruction3. He is considered a paradigmic individual who is cognize to provoke intense reactions among people love and acceptance or rejection and exclusion of his ideas. Being so, he is very influential as a teacher, adviser, social reformer or a significant religious figure4. His words are powerful enough to strike ones emotions and conscience especially with moral dilemmas that can compromise ones integrity. He has been known for his discourses using questioning or the Socratic dialectic wherein he draws out the truth from people by asking them questions. He believes that each person possesses an inherent truth and it only takes deep questioning to allow it out. In doing so, the person comes up with a clearer definition of a key concept from his own thinking. Socrates believes this as a more effective method of learning rather than filling up an empty watercraft with knowledge, or spoonfeeding information. The Socratic method involves a series of questions until a contradicting view surfaces to oppose the initial assumption.5 His controversial style is unparalleled and can be considered too heavy for some people because he communicates on more than one level. With his Socratic irony, he maintains two levels of meaning the literal or transparent level and the hidden or real level. People with deep wisdom can easily rede his thinking and realize that things are not always as they first appear. Sometimes, there is a deeper meaning that should be unearthed6. The inquisitor begins with a position of not knowing anything but leads the questioning.7 At times, though, he uses ambiguous, but well-chosen examples in his discourses. They may even be counterintuitive or poorly supported claims, but he uses them with discernment, knowing that it would bring about more thinking from his students and could be a better system in achieving protreptic and pedagogical goals.8 In this way, Socrates may be considered a unique kind of teacher who successfully keeps his audience at awe of his teachings, ever alert and vigilant for bits of knowledge they can gain from such a wise man. From his earlier interest in scientific theories, he moved on to thinking about the development of the moral character of a person.9 Having served as a